Instead of picking a single AI specialist for each question, you talk to your entire team at once. They answer together and build on each other, so every reply reflects strategy, precedent, parenting, and paperwork at the same time.
Write your message, or attach a document, in a single chat. A coordinator reads what you sent and routes it to the specialists who can help.
Each specialist responds in turn, building on what the others said, so you get one connected answer instead of eight disconnected ones.
These are the specialists on your team. Each one has a distinct role, and they share the same conversation and the same understanding of your case.
Positioning and risk. Norwood frames your situation the way a judge would read it and keeps your approach measured and credible.
Authorities from CanLII, applied to your facts. Lockhart finds the relevant law and connects it to your specific situation.
Best-interests framing, the status quo, and patterns over time. Caldwell keeps the focus on the children and the record.
Court-ready affidavits, forms, and quality control. Pemberton turns the conversation into documents that hold up.
Trauma-informed first contact. When you just need to tell your story, Rowan listens first, validates what you share, and gently gathers the facts before anything legal happens.
Child support using the Federal Child Support Guidelines table amounts, section 7 expenses, imputed income, and financial disclosure. Sterling never invents a number, showing the math and the document each figure comes from.
Most family matters settle. Vance works on offer framing, mediation prep, trade-offs, and the shape of minutes of settlement, keeping the temperature low.
Plays opposing counsel in private. Crane finds the weak paragraph, previews cross-examination, and always ends with exactly how to fix each weakness.
When the team states a point of law, it is checked against CanLII. You see the result as a trust chip on the answer: verified when the authority holds up, and not verified when it does not, so you always know what stands on solid ground.
Answers are also screened so they stay legal information. The team does not give personalized legal advice and does not promise outcomes. This is the layer that keeps the whole experience defensible.
A parent's willingness to support the child's relationship with the other parent is a relevant factor under the best-interests test.
Verified in CanLIIA single missed weekend automatically changes a custody order.
Not verifiedAnswers are screened to stay legal information, not advice, and never a guarantee of a particular outcome.
Children were kept an extra weekend without prior notice.
You raised the missed exchange in writing and kept a copy.
Possible filing deadline detected. Add to your deadlines?
As you describe what happened, the team proposes dated timeline entries drawn from your own words. Nothing is added to your record until you review and approve it.
It also spots dates that look like deadlines and offers to add them, so important dates do not slip past while you focus on the conversation.
The team can also read your case file on demand, including your timeline, deadlines, documents, and incidents, so answers reflect what is already on the record. It can propose new entries and deadlines too, and every proposal waits for your approval; nothing is written to the record automatically.
Your evidence belongs in the conversation. Drop in the PDFs and images that matter and the team reads and analyses them without leaving the thread.
Add PDFs and images directly in the same conversation, right where you are already working.
The team reads and analyses what you attach in the same thread, alongside everything you have already said.
Your documents are encrypted at rest, so your evidence stays protected while it sits in your case file.
Please note: AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Litigent is not a law firm.
One conversation. Strategy, precedent, parenting, and paperwork, all working the same file.