The family court system was not designed with you in mind. Litigent was — and it was engineered for the kind of courtroom defensibility that lawyers charge thousands of dollars to deliver.
Family courts across Canada have a structural problem that disproportionately affects self-represented litigants.
The system doesn't hate you.
It just wasn't built for you. The paperwork, the deadlines, the procedural traps — they punish people who don't know the rules. Litigent doesn't just teach you the rules. It runs them for you.
These are not generic AI features bolted onto a chatbot. Each one is purpose-built infrastructure for Canadian family court — and visible across every interaction with the platform.
Every matter type carries New Brunswick procedural context — the correct court, rule citations, and jurat — surfaced to the drafter at run-time so the output reflects local NB practice, not a generic Canadian template. Ontario and the rest of Canada are being onboarded the same rigorous, source-verified way.
When a required section is thin, the agent asks the right follow-up — anchored in case law. Gordon v. Goertz prompts for material change. FCSG s. 21 for income disclosure. RJR-MacDonald three-branch for urgent motions. Divorce Act s. 16(3) for best-interests factors. The questions are not generated. They are curated.
Every required section has a per-matter rubric: minimum word count + marker phrases the scorer looks for. The export gate refuses to ship an affidavit until the rubric is satisfied. No incomplete filings reach a courthouse.
A background pass over voice testimony detects evidentiary patterns — DARVO, alienation cues, coercive-control signals, schedule volatility — and surfaces them to a legal-review queue. Patterns are never auto-inserted into the affidavit. Operators decide what makes it in.
Region templates emit the precise court heading, opener (“MAKE OATH AND SAY” in NB, “SWEAR AND SAY” in AB, “SWORN TO at…” in NS), commissioner title, and form label per province. Registrar-acceptable on first filing.
Every exported document is hashed (SHA-256) and the hash is stored with the session record. Every voice session captures a consent record — timestamp, IP, user agent, disclaimer version. Defensible against any post-hoc “that wasn't what you sent” challenge.
A legal AI that hallucinates a citation is worse than no legal AI at all. Litigent is built on a closed-loop evaluation system that holds every release to a measurable standard before it ever touches a real case.
Every model upgrade, every prompt change, every new province addition passes through the golden-suite replay before deploy. Drift is detected before it reaches you.
Curated test cases for Norwood, Lockhart, Caldwell, and Price agents run on every release. Outputs are diffed against baseline. Regressions block deploy.
Each New Brunswick matter type has a section-level rubric. Markers + minimum word counts decide what counts as “done”.
Conversational state tracks recent agent questions and section coverage. The interviewer cannot loop. Survives refreshes and 503s without losing thread.
Every generated paragraph runs through a legal-advice classifier. Flagged candidates are replaced with safe-fallback language. Every substitution is logged for ops review.
Real statutes. Real rules. Real forms. Not a single line of generic Canadian content where a province-specific one exists.
The same prompt to ChatGPT will not produce a court-defensible filing. Here is the difference, line by line.
A generic AI is fine for explaining what an affidavit is. Litigent is built to file one.
Not a single chat agent wearing many hats. Eight specialists, each with its own prompt, its own evaluation criteria, and its own area of legal expertise, orchestrated by a coordinator that resolves conflicts before the result reaches you. And the team keeps growing.
"Father's rights" is a complicated phrase. Litigent doesn't use it to advance an agenda — we use it to describe a real gap in the system that results in children losing meaningful relationships with loving, capable fathers because those fathers couldn't navigate a paperwork maze designed to be navigated by professionals.
Every provincial best-interests factor — from the child's physical safety to extended-family relationships — can be argued and documented. Litigent helps you argue them. Not emotionally. Legally.
The best interests of your children include having a prepared parent in their corner.
The Canadian family court system processes tens of thousands of cases per year where one or both parties are self-represented. The outcomes for self-represented litigants are statistically worse — not because they care less, but because they don't know the rules and they don't have the tools.
Litigent's mission is simple: give every self-represented Canadian access to the same quality of legal preparation that was previously available only to those who could afford $500/hour.
Legal Disclaimer: Litigent provides legal information and AI-assisted document preparation tools. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Always consult a licensed Canadian family lawyer before making legal decisions or filing court documents. Litigent is not a law firm and its agents are not lawyers.
Province-aware. Eval-tested. Citation-verified. Tamper-evident. Start free, no credit card.