Affidavit of Income in British Columbia
- •An affidavit of income is a sworn statement of your earnings, used in any family proceeding involving child or spousal support. Required when you don't have a separate financial statement form, or in addition to it.
- •Filed under BC Supreme Court Family Rules, Form F8 — Financial Statement using Form F1 (Supreme Court Civil Rules). Must disclose ALL income sources — not just employment — and attach supporting documents (tax returns, pay stubs, NOAs).
- •Incomplete or evasive income disclosure is the #1 reason for imputed-income orders in Canadian family court. The court will assume you're hiding more than what you fail to disclose.
Filing procedure in British Columbia
Motions on this topic in British Columbia are governed by BC Supreme Court Family Rules, Form F8 — Financial Statement. The supporting affidavit is filed using Form F1 (Supreme Court Civil Rules).
Filed with the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Each British Columbia family courthouse has slightly different motion-day schedules and filing-counter procedures — check the courthouse-specific page for your city before filing.
Who needs an affidavit of income
- Any payor or recipient of child support
- Any payor or recipient of spousal support
- Parties in property-division applications under provincial law
- Parties seeking variation of an existing support order
- Parties responding to a support application
What to disclose — all income sources
Federal Child Support Guidelines define 'income' broadly — all sources for the relevant year. Common sources you must declare:
- Employment income (T4 / employer payments)
- Self-employment income (business net income after expenses)
- Rental income (gross, with deductible expenses listed)
- Investment income — interest, dividends, capital gains
- Pension income (CPP, OAS, employer pensions, RRIFs)
- Employment Insurance benefits
- Disability benefits (CPP-D, provincial, private)
- Worker's Compensation
- Trust income
- Sporadic income — bonuses, commissions, side work
- Income from another country (declare gross, before foreign tax)
Supporting documents to attach
- Last 3 years of personal tax returns (T1 General) — Exhibit A by convention
- Last 3 years of Notice of Assessment (NOA) — Exhibit B
- Last 3 pay stubs for employed parties — Exhibit C
- Last 3 years of business financial statements if self-employed
- Last 3 years of corporate financials if you control a corporation
- Statement of partnership income if applicable
- Recent investment statements (RRSP, TFSA, taxable accounts)
- Statement of pension benefits if receiving
What happens if you under-disclose
Courts have broad discretion under FCSG s.19 to 'impute' income — assign you a higher income than what you've claimed — when:
- You're intentionally under-employed or unemployed
- Your income tax position doesn't fairly represent income available for support
- You're hiding income through corporations, family arrangements, or cash work
- Your lifestyle is materially inconsistent with declared income
- You fail to provide adequate disclosure
Imputed income is usually higher than your actual income. The court is not punishing you — it's preventing strategic under-disclosure. The cure is full, honest disclosure up front.
Frequently asked
What if my income fluctuates year to year?
Disclose every year. The court will typically use a 3-year average for self-employed or commissioned parties, or annualize based on recent months for employed parties. Don't pick a low year and hope — that gets imputed against you.
Do I need to disclose my new partner's income?
No — your new partner is not a party to the proceeding and their income isn't directly relevant to your support obligation. Some provincial regimes consider household income in spousal support contexts; this is jurisdiction-specific and your own income disclosure is what matters first.
What if I refuse to disclose?
The court can compel disclosure, strike your pleadings, find you in contempt, or impute income at a punitive level. Non-disclosure also typically results in cost orders against you. There's no strategic upside.